|
HOME│SYNOPSIS│THE
PROCESS│CULTURES│DO
THESE PROBLEMS SOUND FAMILIAR? │EMPLOYEE
EVALUATIONS│EMPLOYEE
MOTIVATION│INTERNAL
CUSTOMERS│PSA
AND QUALITY│PSA
AND ACCOUNTING│FAQ’s│CONTACT
US│GRUNSTEN
AND ASSOCIATES
General
-
Recurring crisis
- Reactive rather than
preventive approach to problem solving
- Projects behind
schedule or never completed
- Lack of follow-up
Quality
- Quality rejects
generally traced to the failure to execute a known
procedure (soldering iron temperature not checked, an unapproved solvent
was substituted, an incoming audit skipped)
- Quality personnel
assume the role of sole guardians of customer mandated quality
systems—other departments are “too busy” to deal with them
- Continued reliance
on 100% inspections due to ineffective or non-existent process controls
- Failure of support
department to perform (equipment
improperly maintained, depleted manufacturing supplies, incorrect
inventories resulting in rushed production and increased rejects and
costs)
Production
- Supervisors not
monitoring the quality and pace of their lines while they seek support
personnel (machines needing adjustment, material shortages, engineering
drawings)
- Reliance on quality
inspectors to detect errors
- Compensating with
unauthorized methods and overtime when support departments fail to provide
timely service
Maintenance
- Constant machine
adjustments rather than permanent fixes
- Downtimes due to
lack of spare parts
- Machine breakdowns
due to fail to perform preventive maintenance
- “Lack of manpower”
or maintenance supplies accepted for failure to provide support
Accounting
- Cost overruns such
as overtime, scrap, rework are “explained” rather than avoided
Human Resources
- Subjective and
ineffective annual performance reviews
- De-motivated
employees due to differences of opinion on their contribution
- Lack of timely
feedback
- Poor assessment of
new operator performance during trial period
- Un-focused training
- Difficulty in
rationalizing number of indirect personnel
A careful examination of each of these
problems yields the same basic sources of failure:
— A lack of clear understanding of
individual tasks and responsibilities (more)
— Missing individual
feedback
(more)
— Accountability is not validated by
reward or corrective action (more)
— A lack of constant awareness of
vulnerabilities (more)
—Lack of incentives to improve
Process
simplifications, on-hand material and training are implemented to improve
individual performance. Individual incentive causes everyone to look for
methods to make it easier to do well.
The Process and Service Accountability
system provides for clear understanding of responsibilities, frequent
individual feedback, accountability, assessment of every aspect of the
operation and incentives for improvement.
|